Sunday, December 4, 2011

Margaret Anne Cleek, Richard Guarino, Michael Youril

An open process for drafting legislation would assure that from the onset all camps are heard from and all data considered.” Sunshine” or open meeting laws are in place to assure this. Instead of this happening, proponents of special-interest ordinances are being advised on websites and at legislative workshops to establish “coalitions” or “taskforces” which are independent of the legislative body of the municipality. Thus they are not subject to the open meeting laws and sunshine laws which exist. City or county staff is co-opted and a proposed ordinance is presented by staff. Public trust in government is eroded when legislation to be proposed is drafted in private and votes are solicited in private without public knowledge or debate, and without those opposed being given sufficient warning to garner opposition or participate in the process. Such a situation operates within the guidelines of the letter of the sunshine principle, but not within the spirit of the sunshine principle, for the legislation is the product of a private coalition where openness, inclusion, and unanimity is falsely maintained.. Not honoring the spirit as well as the letter of sunshine laws allows special interests to hijack local government.

1 comment:

  1. Sneaking the “Big Lie” through the Back Door: How Special Interest Groups are Hijacking Local Legislation

    Margaret Anne Cleek
    California State University, Sacramento

    Richard Guarino
    California State University, Sacramento

    Michael Youril
    California State University, Sacramento



    http://www.avianresources.com/Sneaking.htm

    ReplyDelete